How a normative framework can help improve collaboration between researchers and citizens - Part 2: The principles of public engagement and the ScienceUs Academy
When it comes to citizen science, civic engagement and co-creation between scientists and citizens, practical experience raises questions about the ethics of participation: Why do participatory projects sometimes raise false expectations and lead to frustration? Which social groups have the opportunity to participate? Which are excluded and why? How do we integrate the practical knowledge of citizens as experts in their circumstances? How can we reduce epistemic inequity in collaborations between researchers and lay people?
A Codex by the Berlin School of Public Engagement proposes basic principles for ethical dialogue between science and the public:
– The objectives, funding and stakeholders of research are presented transparently.
– Science communication is strategically planned and evaluated, and quality assurance standards are observed.
– The orientation is democratic and strictly based on human rights.
– Research results are presented in an unbiased and objective manner, including, for example, scientific failures.
– Controversial issues are reported in full and without distortion.
– The willingness of researchers to engage in dialogue with society is actively encouraged.
– Different perspectives are taken into account and communication remains clear and aims to be generally understandable.
– Lay people are actively encouraged to form their own opinions.
– A wide range of opportunities for participation is offered, including the possibility of co-determination and collaboration between researchers and other stakeholders.
The Codex and its principles will be presented and discussed in detail at the ScienceUs Upscale Academy. We want to provide a normative framework for citizen science projects to actively shape information exchange and collaboration between science and societal stakeholders. Join the ScienceUs community to learn more!
For further information:
“Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Research Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.”